We have released the video above which demonstrates the practical applications of our research in emergency care situations. In this case study, nurses or student nurses wearing a Smart-Assistant (in this example Smart-Eye-Ware) are attempting to resuscitate a patient (doll). Besides offering information on demand in their HMD (e.g. instant feedback, regulations or quick-check information, hints), the Smart-Assistant also detects specific activities like performing chest compressions and provides feedback if the activity is not performed to required standards.

This research expands on work presented in the award winning papers: Smart-Watch Life Saver: Smart-Watch Interactive-Feedback System for Improving Bystander CPR and Recognizing Hospital Care Activities with a Pocket Worn Smartphone (award details here).

*** Daily Agenda is now out ***

Organisers

Michael Rovatsos, The University of Edinburgh, mrovatso@inf.ed.ac.uk
Ronald Chenu-Abente, University of Trento, chenu@disi.unitn.it

Background

Diversity is pervasive in human nature and culture, and is deeply rooted in the variation of natural traits and experience among individuals, the collectives they form, and the environments they inhabit. When humans reason individually, they maintain different representations, conceptualisations, and theories, and apply different rules of inference, learning, and decision making. When they interact with each other to combine their skills or resources, to coordinate their activities, and to resolve conflicts between their individual objectives, they exchange information and knowledge, negotiate and align their individual views, and adapt to each other’s behaviour dynamically. Arguably, diversity is not only a phenomenon that humans have to deal with, but it is also the vehicle for achieving some of the most impressive products of human intelligence.

Artificial Intelligence, on the other hand, has so far largely relied on a certain degree of homogeneity, not necessarily in terms of the components involved in a method or system, but in terms of the process that combines them. While various areas within AI have already developed methods that can cope with and/or exploit diversity to some extent, for example

• electronic markets where individual agents have different goals and aim to maximise their own profit,
• hybrid robot architectures that involve different layers of representation and reasoning,
• knowledge sharing infrastructures where different agents use different domain ontologies, and
• machine learning systems that combine different sources of data and/or learning units,

more often than not, these systems still involve a “monolithic”, global approach to integration. This usually derives from a global task context, a common intermediate representation layer, or a global output to be produced by the integrated system.

We believe that there is a huge potential in bringing the insights from work on problems that involve diversity – like those listed in the examples above – together to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of diversity, as well as to develop principled methodological approaches that will enable us to better utilise diversity in future AI systems.

Workshop Description

The workshop seeks to explore diversity as a phenomenon that both poses a challenge for AI in terms of dealing with and managing diversity in an intelligent system (or ecosystem of intelligent human and/or artificial agents) and presents an opportunity in terms of leveraging diversity (for example through processes like crowdsourcing and collaborative knowledge production) to achieve human-like (and human-friendly) capabilities in more open-ended, incrementally evolving, and interactive AI systems.

We aim to bring together researchers from different communities that have each addressed diversity in different ways, such as

• hierarchical and hybrid inference systems (combining representation and reasoning mechanisms),
• semantic web and ontologies (interoperability of information sources, ontology alignment),
• non-monotonic and defeasible reasoning (reasoning about conflicting and changing information),
• mechanism design and social choice (reaching agreement in the presence of conflict of interest),
• language evolution and emergent semantics (evolving shared symbol and concept spaces),
• cross-lingual approaches to natural language understanding (integrating different natural languages),
• teamwork and collaborative multiagent systems (integrating heterogeneous knowledge/behaviours),
• human-AI/human-robot collaboration (aligning agents’ views and objectives with those of humans),
• crowdsourcing and human computation (managing diverse contributions of large human collectives).

The workshop will provide an open forum for researchers from these (and other) areas to contribute their insights on diversity in order to develop a shared agenda for the future study of diversity in AI. We welcome submissions on all aspects of diversity, ranging from theoretical foundations to practical applications, case studies, and surveys. The workshop will be heavily discussion-based, with relatively short paper presentations and a focus on formulating key research questions and a longer-term research agenda for the area. To enable high-quality discussion and debate, a key evaluation criterion will be the focus of papers contributed to the workshop on the diversity “angle“ of the research reported. Specifically, papers should clearly identify

• what type of diversity or aspects of diversity the reported research investigates or accommodates,
• the methods the paper proposes to deal with and/or exploit diversity,
• how the proposed method combines and/or exceeds existing diversity-oriented capabilities, and
• what key challenges in terms of diversity it leaves open for future research.

Beyond this key requirement, we deliberately impose no restrictions on methodological approach, or maturity of the research. In particular, the workshop aims to be inclusive with regard to the types of diversity considered, including (but not limited to) diversity of representations, algorithms, systems infrastructures, datasets, agent behaviours, skills and capabilities, preferences and objectives, but also users, user populations, cultures, contexts of use, application domains, user interfaces, etc.

Also, in keeping with the Special Topic of ECAI 2016 Artificial Intelligence for Human Values, we particularly invite papers that address the ethics and social impact of AI applications related to diversity, for example addressing issues related to the social dynamics of diversity in systems comprising of humans and artificial agents, the emergence of “digital divides“ and the implications of diversity on the cohesiveness of these systems, diversity-aware accountability and privacy methods, or the potential risks and benefits of diversity-aware AI in terms of promoting human diversity in various domains.

Paper submission

We invite full (8-12 pages) and short (4-6 pages) papers for presentation at the workshop, to be submitted through the workshop’s Easychair web site using the ECAI format (which can be downloaded together with instructions from this page). Each paper will be peer-reviewed by at least two Programme Committee members, and authors will be expected to produce final versions of their papers in good time before the workshop.

All accepted papers will be made available online prior to the workshop, and distributed to all participants in hardcopy. If a sufficiently high number of high-quality papers is received, we will aim to produce a special issue in a high-quality journal where revised versions of the papers will be published alongside invited papers.

Important dates

The following is a (tentative) timeline of key dates:

• Paper submission deadline – 14th June 2016 extended to 17th June 2016
• Author notification – 28th June 2016 30th June 2016
• Camera-ready versions – 15th July 2016
• Workshop – 29th or 30th August 2016

Agenda

The following is the workshop agenda for the 29th of August:

09:15-09:30 Welcome
09:30-10:00 Towards Building Ontologies with the Wisdom of the Crowd. Paula Chocron, Dagmar Gromann and Francisco José Quesada Real
10:00-10:30 A Methodology to Take Account of Diversity in Collective Adaptive Systems. Heather S. Packer and Luc Moreau
10:30-11:00 Coffee break
11:00-11:30 Diversity-Aware Recommendation for Human Collectives. Pavlos Andreadis, Sofia Ceppi, Michael Rovatsos and Subramanian Ramamoorthy
11:30-12:00 Industry talk: Democracy by Design. Marcel van Hest
12:00-13:00 Invited talk by Antonella de Angeli
13:00-14:00 Lunch
14:00-14:20 A Semantic Distance based Architecture for a Guesser Agent in ESSENCE’s Location Taboo Challenge. Kemo Adrian, Aysenur Bilgin and Paul Van Eecke
14:20-14:40 Interdisciplinarity as an Indicator of Diversity in a Corpus of Artificial Intelligence Research Articles. Bilge Say
14:40-15:00 Managing human diversity in diverse multi-agent collaborative intelligence systems. Mark Hartswood, Kevin Page, Avi Segal, Kobi Gal and Marina Jirotka
15:00-15:20 Analysing communicative diversity via the Stag Hunt. Robert van Rooij and Katrin Schulz
15:20-15:40 Domain-Based Sense Disambiguation in Multilingual Structured Data. Gabor Bella, Alessio Zamboni and Fausto Giunchiglia
15:40-16:10 Coffee break
16:15-17:15 Panel discussion
17:15-17:30 Wrap-up

Financial Support

The workshop is sponsored by the ESSENCE (www.essence-network.com) and SmartSociety (www.smart-society-project.eu) projects, which will provide extensive financial support to participants, in particular PhD students and junior researchers who wish to participate. To be eligible for such support, interested individuals should submit a short or full paper, and email Michael Rovatsos (mrovatso@inf.ed.ac.uk) with a one-page case for support, providing a short bio, describing their interest in the workshop, and specifying the requested amount together with a justification of the anticipated expenses.

Committees

Workshop Organisers

Michael Rovatsos, The University of Edinburgh, mrovatso@inf.ed.ac.uk
Ronald Chenu-Abente, University of Trento, chenu@disi.unitn.it

Steering Committee

Alan Bundy, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Peter Gardenfors, University of Lund, Sweden
Fausto Giunchiglia, University of Trento, Italy
Asuncion Gomez Perez, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain
Ben Kuipers, University of Michigan, USA
Ariel Procaccia, Carnegie-Mellon University, USA
Carles Sierra, IIIA-CSIC Barcelona, Spain
Luc Steels, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium
Michael Wooldridge, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Gerhard Weiss, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

Programme Committee

Yoram Bachrach, Microsoft Research Cambridge, United Kingdom
Gabor Bella, University of Trento, Italy
Sofia Ceppi, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Jerome Euzenat, INRIA Grenoble, France
Kobi Gal, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Fabien Gandon, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France
Mark Hartswood, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Nick Hawes, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Catholijn Jonker, Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands
Ian Kash, Microsoft Research Cambridge, United Kingdom
Oliver Lemon, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Nicolas Maudet, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
Fiona McNeill, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Roberto Navigli, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy
Luc Moreau, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Iyad Rahwan, MIT, USA
Subramanian Ramamoorthy, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Katharina Reinecke, University of Washington, USA
Robert van Rooij, ILLC University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Carlos Ruiz, TAIGER S.A., Spain
Marco Schorlemmer, IIIA-CSIC Barcelona, Spain
Onn Shehory, IBM Haifa Labs, Israel
Pavel Shvaiko, Informatica Trentina, Italy
Remi van Trijp, Sony Computer Science Labs Paris, France

SmartSociety is taking part in ICT DAYS, an initiative by the University of Trento‘s DISI (Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science), dedicated to the broad subject of Information and Communication Technology.

ICT DAYS has had many years of success since its launch on 2009. It serves as a meeting point for companies and university students, organizes a hackathon and attracts prospective students through its Education Day. The initiative also features a series of communicative events, such as seminars, demos and contests.

SmartSociety’s panel on the 19th of March is titled:

Collaboration between humans and machines: Promises and Perils

Abstract: In today’s hybrid society we are unconsciously observed and continuously assisted by ICT systems. How to make sure that this takes place with the right coordination and ethical control? The panel will report insights from the project SMARTSOCIETY funded by the EC under FP7 Future Emerging Technologies programme.

For more information, please visit the event website.

Dr. Maltese, the Project Manager of SmartSociety, starts with a description of our project and goals, while giving a personal view on the most interesting aspects in this. When asked for an example, he points us to the everyday use of mobile devices, particularly when used to transmit location and activity data, as well as social networking. The interview ends with a brief discussion on the impact SmartSociety is expected to have in our lives, with particular mention to the need for raising people’s awareness on issues such as effective use, safety and privacy.

You can watch the complete 4 minute interview below, or directly on Youtube, here.

Download: http://bit.ly/1XCYTme

The Smart City Expo World Congress is the international event on smart cities, bringing together over 400 cities around the world, more than 200 companies, 400 speakers and the leading institutions and experts in urban transformation. You can find more details on the event here, and watch a video of the presentation here, or below:

Our paper “Recognizing Hospital Care Activities with a Pocket Worn Smartphone” received the Best Paper Award at the 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE 2014).

This has been a joint effort of the German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and the University of Trento, and concerns the problem of “semantic gap” between machine and human semantics.

Abstract: In this work, we show how a smart-phone worn unobtrusively in a nurses coat pocket can be used to document the patient care activities performed during a regular morning routine. The main contribution is to show how, taking into account certain domain specific boundary conditions, a single sensor node worn in such an (from the sensing point of view) unfavorable location can still recognize complex, sometimes subtle activities. We evaluate our approach in a large real life dataset from day to day hospital operation. In total, 4 runs of patient care per day were collected for 14 days at a geriatric ward and annotated in high detail by following the performing nurses for the entire duration. This amounts to over 800 hours of sensor data including acceleration, gyroscope, compass, wifi and sound annotated with groundtruth at less than 1min resolution.

Index Terms: Activity Recognition, health care documentation, real-world study

Citation: Gernot Bahle, Agnes Gruenerbl, Enrico Bignotti, Mattia Zeni, Fausto Giunchiglia and Paul Lukowicz (2014): “Recognizing Hospital Care Activities with a Pocket Worn Smartphone”, 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE 2014, http://mobicase.org/2014/show/home)

You can find the complete list of proceedings here: http://proceedings.dev.icstweb.eu/2014/mobicase2014/file-storage/index.html#submissions

[wpdm_file id=38]

Abstract. We see the local content from peers organized in directories (i.e., on local ordered lists) of local representations of entities from the real world (e.g., persons, locations, events). Different local representations can give different “versions” of the same real world entity and use different names to refer to it. (e.g., George Lombardi, Lombardi G., Prof. Lombardi, Dad). Although the data from these directories are related and could complement each other, there are no links that allow peers to share and search across them. We propose a Distributed Directory System that constructs these connecting links and allows peers to: (i) maintain their data locally and (ii) find the different versions of a real world entity based on any name used in the network. We evaluate the approach in networks of different sizes using PlanetLab and we show that the results are promising in terms of the scalability.

Keywords: Name-Based Entity Search, P2P, Entity Directory

Citation: F. Giunchiglia and A. Hume. A Distributed Directory System. In 9th Int. Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems (SSWS) @ISWC2013.

Download: http://bit.ly/268OEeY

Abstract. Despite their success in general applications, social networks also present a series of challenges like attracting user signups, keeping a healthy contribution level, user privacy concerns, etc. This paper introduces the Social Core – a social network engine that adds semantic-based functionalities like semantic annotations, semantic search and semantic-enhanced access control; as a way to enhance and answer to the current challenges of social applications. The Social Core was integrated as part of the SmartCampus mobile platform, which is currently being live tested by around one hundred students.

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41242-4_50

Citation: F. Giunchiglia., I. Zaihrayeu, R. Chenu-Abente (2013). A semantic-enabled engine for mobile social networks. Poster presentation at ESWC 2013 Workshop paper presentation at co-located SWCS 2013. Montpellier (FR).

Download: http://bit.ly/1SeVdDz

Abstract. The physical space is populated with sense, which is gathered, manipulated and reinvented during its interpretation. Here is proposed a provisional list on how sense  imbricates places and some possible ways of making use of it for design purposes can be argued. Memory, emotions, reflexivity, sociality, and bewildering therefore become  qualities that can be explored in the physical space from HCI.

Author Keywords: Sense making, physical space, spatial reasoning, memory, emotions, reflexivity, sociality, bewildering.

ACM Classification Keywords: Design, Human Factors, Theory.

http://studiolab.ide.tudelft.nl/studiolab/sxdchi13/

Citation: S. Torsi (2013). Building Sense in the Infosphere. In Giaccardi, E.,Ciolfi, L., Hornecker, E., Speed, C., Bardzell, S. (2013) CHI 2013 Workshop “Exploration in Social Interaction Design”. Paris (FR), 28th. April 2013.

Download: http://bit.ly/1MBj7vW

Abstract. The construct of notification in motion is here presented providing a picture of the complex, dynamic, emerging relationships occurring between the individual and the environment. In order to approach the design problem of information load, Peripheral Awareness has been described and contextualized in a theoretical framework. Some methodological approaches and examples related to this paradigm are then presented. Design guidelines for notification in motion are described. The overall picture that should emerge would be an ecological paradigm of human behavior, which could be taken in consideration while designing for notification in motion.

Keywords: Design Theory, Ecological Psychology, Peripheral Awareness, Notification in Motion.

Citation: Torsi, S. Notification in Motion. Theoretical Frameworks and Design Guidelines. JMMT: Journal of Man, Machine and Tecnology (ISSN: 2234-1625)

Download: http://bit.ly/1MBjaIn

Abstract. We see the local content from peers organized in directories (i.e., on local ordered lists) containing local representations of entities from the real world (e.g., persons, locations, events). Different local representations can give different “versions” of the same real world entity and use different names to refer to it (e.g., Fausto Giunchiglia, Giunchiglia F., Prof. Giunchiglia). Although the names used in these directories connect data that could complement each other, there are no links that allow peers to share and search across them. We propose a Distributed Directory of Entities that makes explicit these connecting links and allows peers to: (i) maintain their data locally and (ii) find the different versions of a real world entity based on any name used in the network. The model we present exploits the name as the central (multi-value) attribute of entities and aims to convince readers of the importance of such names in a peer-to-peer scenario.

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41242-4_47

Citation: F. Giunchiglia., A. Hume. (2013). A Distributed-entity Directory. Poster presentation at ESWC 2013 Workshop paper presentation at co-located SWCS 2013. Montpellier (FR).

Download: http://bit.ly/268OEeY